Month: May 2020

Eclipsing Binary Star System: V1053 Her

Eclipsing Binary Star System: V1053 Her

V1053 in Hercules is 13th magnitude that varies around 0.9 magnitudes from crest to trough. One of my goals was to determine a minimum exposure needed to produce satisfactory results. Satisfactory is subjective but for now I think that the “60-second data” is acceptable.

When I captured the image files I alternated between a 60-second exposure and a 30-second exposure for the entire 6.9-hour period. Due to my east-facing only imaging window I had to break it up into three sessions: May 14, 21, and 22. Afterwards I used AstroImageJ to calibrate and align the images, and then to perform differential photometry against a known constant-brightness star. If one were to look at the light curve taken by professionals you would see a noise-free sinusoidal pattern. Unfortunately the equipment required to reproduce such exceptional results are beyond my means. Instead I must settle for a certain degree of noise.

Notice that the 60-second plot (the top one) is less noisy than the 30-second plot (the bottom one). Furthermore, notice that there are outliers in the 30-second data, about an inch to the left of the red vertical “cursor”. This was part of the last session on May 22. The session started with the Sun only 16 degrees below the horizon, technically astronomical twilight, but true darkness arrived only 15 minutes later. The session lasted nearly 3 hours but notice how the outliers persisted for nearly half the session. My theory is that the atmosphere was “boiling” with turbulence. The interesting thing is this: notice how the outliers don’t exist in the 60-second data set. Here my theory is that doubling the exposure “averaged out” the negative effects of the turbulent atmosphere. I wonder if this has implications for conventional astrophotography? I’ll have to experiment with stacking two adjacent 30-second frames to see if it mitigates it.

One other interesting aspect to the light curve is that the “primary minimum” does not occur at exactly Phase: 0. I had a theory about this but then I researched it online and discovered that this is indicative of the existence of a large dark body that is perturbing the orbits of the stars: an Exoplanet!

Here is my new website that I developed for sharing my work with variable stars. The charts are fully interactive.

How to braid with four strands of wire

How to braid with four strands of wire

I am now onto my third stepper motor in two years. The motor is part of my self-designed right ascension drive system with periodic error correction.

When I designed the system I chose a specific stepper motor from an overseas manufacturer. I knew that one day the motor might need to be replaced so I purchased a half dozen. That first motor lasted more than a year but the second one for only a couple months. Such is the state of quality control. I am now onto my third one.

There are four wires coming out of the motor that can easily form a rat’s nest. You need to tame it or else sayounara. For the first motor I used “heat shrink tubing” seen here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat-shrink_tubing

but I needed to chain quite a lot of them together to meet the requisite length of 20 inches. Furthermore I needed a “heat gun” in order to shrink the tubing. (If you are adventurous you can use a butane lighter.)

For the second motor I did not have enough tubing so I looked online for other solutions. I came across this 3-minute YouTube video on how to braid four strands (of anything):

It works for me although I should mention that you should ask your significant other to help straighten the wire before attempting to braid it. The stepper motor manufacturer did a poor job of preparing the wire for shipment. It looks like someone twirled it around their fingers a few times and then stuffed it in the box.

I’ve attached a photo of the braided wire after I got done. (Remember “Turn” and “Cross”, “Turn” and “Cross”…)